🔗 Share this article

Deductibles. In-network. Non-preferred providers. Premium health services. Out-of-pocket expenses. Fixed payment. Co-insurance. Insurance consultants. Insurance brokers. Healthcare consultants. Affordable Care Act. HMO. Preferred Provider Organization. Exclusive Provider Organization. POS. HDHP. Health Savings Account. Flexible Spending Account. HRA. Explanation of Benefits. Consolidated Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act. SHOP. Single coverage. Family coverage. Insurance subsidies.

Confused? You should be. Who comprehends this complex system? Not the typical business owner. Nor the typical employee. Choosing the right healthcare insurance for our business – or for our families – seems like it requires advanced expertise in medical insurance.

The Healthcare System Is More Than Complicated, It Is Costly

According to recent research, typical households spends $twenty-seven thousand annually on medical coverage (increasing by 6% compared to last year). The average company healthcare expense is projected to exceed $seventeen thousand per employee in 2026, an increase of 9.5% from 2025.

Now federal operations is shut down because political disagreements over tax credits which analysts predict will lead to premium increases up to 100% for millions of Americans.

When Will We Truly Examine National Health Insurance?

When will we seriously consider universal healthcare coverage in the United States? I have to believe we're approaching that point since this can't continue.

I'm not proposing national healthcare. I'm advocating for our current Medicare program – an established insurance framework – simply expand to include all citizens. Our infrastructure doesn't change. How our healthcare providers receive payment would change. Trust me, they will adjust.

How National Health Insurance Could Function

A national health insurance program would need contributions from employees and employers. In similar programs, a worker earning average wages pays about five point three percent toward medical coverage. The company pays about 13.75%.

Does this appear like a lot? Not if you compare that with what average American pays. I know multiple clients who are easily contributing between eight to fifteen percent of their employee wages for medical benefits. And keep in mind that with inclusive programs, those payments also cover pension plans, illness coverage, parental benefits and job loss protection along with funding healthcare facilities. When you add those costs versus what we pay for our retirement plans, job loss coverage and paid time off, the difference decreases.

Execution for America

For America, a national health premium would increase our Medicare tax deduction, a framework already established. It ought to be means-based – those at higher income levels would contribute higher amounts than lower-income earners. This includes both an employee and employer contribution. And, like many our government's defense, IT, welfare services and transportation services, the system could be managed by private contractors instead of a government office.

Benefits for Entrepreneurs

A national health insurance program represents a huge benefit for entrepreneurs such as my company. It would put us on a level playing field with our larger competitors who can afford better plans. It would make management much easier (a payroll deduction remitted like social security and Medicare taxes, instead of individual transactions to benefit firms and coverage administrators).

It would enable it easier for us to budget our yearly costs, rather than going through the complex (and ineffective) theater of negotiating with the big insurance providers that we must do every year. Because it's simplified, there would exist improved comprehension of coverage by our employees – contrasted with the current system where they have to decipher the complications of existing plans. And there would certainly be less liability for companies since we wouldn't would be privy to our employees' health histories for risk assessment and different options.

Capitalist Perspective

I'm as pro-market as they get. But I've learned that government play important functions in society, from providing defense to funding essential systems. Providing healthcare to all via universal healthcare enhances our economy's infrastructure. It represents superior, easier system for small businesses which hire more than half of American employees and fund half the economic output. It makes it possible employees to enjoy better health, come to work more often and be more productive.

Addressing Concerns

Exist a million considerations I'm not addressing? Of course there are. But with rising medical expenses we've seen in recent years, it's clear that current healthcare legislation isn't functioning very well. And I realize that we're not a compact European nation where big changes are easier to implement. But expanding universal Medicare, even with the additional taxes that would be incurred, would still be a better and less expensive approach for not only controlling healthcare costs but providing access to everyone.

Time for Honest Assessment

We as Americans, we need to reduce our own arrogance. Our healthcare system isn't so great. The US places significantly behind numerous nations in healthcare quality in the world, according to comprehensive research. Maybe one positive aspect in this present circumstances could be that we undertake serious examination in the mirror and acknowledge that big changes are necessary.